2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3025217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Generation of Deceptive Jamming Signal Against Space-Borne SAR

Abstract: Due to advantages such as its low power consumption and higher concealment, deceptive jamming against space-borne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has received extensive attention during the past decades. To reduce the computational complexity in the deceptive jamming operation, this paper proposes a new approach to generate the jamming signal efficiently. Based on the Taylor series expansion and approximation, we derive the recursive formula, which can be used to calculate the current system function of jammer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the inverse range Doppler algorithm (IRDA) [10], two‐step method [11], frequency‐domain three‐level method [12], and mosaic scene deception jamming method based on two‐dimensional separation [13] improve the generation speed of the SAR deception jamming signal by sacrificing the imaging quality of the jamming signal. On the other hand, the inverse Omega‐K algorithm (IωKA) [14], time‐delay and frequency‐shift with template segmentation (TDFS‐TS) algorithm [15], recursive algorithm (RA) [9], spatial frequency‐domain interpolation (SFI) algorithm [16] achieve better imaging quality of the SAR deception jamming signal but at the expense of the SAR deception jamming signal generation speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, the inverse range Doppler algorithm (IRDA) [10], two‐step method [11], frequency‐domain three‐level method [12], and mosaic scene deception jamming method based on two‐dimensional separation [13] improve the generation speed of the SAR deception jamming signal by sacrificing the imaging quality of the jamming signal. On the other hand, the inverse Omega‐K algorithm (IωKA) [14], time‐delay and frequency‐shift with template segmentation (TDFS‐TS) algorithm [15], recursive algorithm (RA) [9], spatial frequency‐domain interpolation (SFI) algorithm [16] achieve better imaging quality of the SAR deception jamming signal but at the expense of the SAR deception jamming signal generation speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various radar electronic countermeasures (ECM) have been developed in recent decades to prevent the detection of sensitive targets and protected areas by enemy SAR [1,3,4]. SAR deception jamming has become popular in recent years because of its low power requirements, flexible operability, and significant damage to SAR [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%