2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast geomagnetic field intensity variations between 1400 and 400 BCE: New archaeointensity data from Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…PSVCs for intensity in Paris (Gómez‐Paccard et al, ; Hervé et al, ) show a good agreement with our paleointensity curve, although it is important to indicate that the Iberian curve is smoother than the French ones. This is probably because it includes a smaller amount of data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…PSVCs for intensity in Paris (Gómez‐Paccard et al, ; Hervé et al, ) show a good agreement with our paleointensity curve, although it is important to indicate that the Iberian curve is smoother than the French ones. This is probably because it includes a smaller amount of data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The present curve indicates a maximal secular variation rate of~250 nT/year during the third century BCE. This rate is five times faster than the average variation rate of 55 nT/year since 1900 CE at Mexico City (Thébault et al, 2015) but is similar to the fastest rate observed in Europe during the last 3,500 years (e.g., Genevey et al, 2016;Hervé et al, 2017). Our curve does not show any evidence for the "geomagnetic spike" seen in 893±135 BCE in two sedimentary sequences of Hall's cave in Texas, only 1,200 km away from Mexico City (Bourne et al, 2016) (Figure 5b).…”
Section: 1029/2019gc008668supporting
confidence: 69%
“…This Levantine Iron Age anomaly (LIAA) was likely at the origin of two short-lived high-intensity events called "geomagnetic spikes" (Ben-Yosef et al, 2009;Shaar et al, 2011). The migration of the LIAA through Europe would be responsible for the large and fast variations of the geomagnetic field observed in this region during the first millennium BCE in both direction (e.g., Hervé et al, 2013;Palencia-Ortas et al, 2017;Shaar et al, 2018) and intensity (e.g., Hervé et al, 2017;Molina-Cardin et al, 2018;Shaar et al, 2016). Besides the role of these nondipolar fields, global reconstructions of data suggest that the influence of the dipolar field should not be underestimated with a maximum of the dipole moment during the first millennium BCE (Usoskin et al, 2016) and a 10-15°dipole tilt during the first half of this millennium (Nilsson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent improvements of the curve of the geomagnetic field intensity will enhance the precision of the archaeomagnetic dating technique between 1200 and 200 bce , because the variation of the intensity was fast during this period (Hervé et al . , , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can now contribute to a better recovery of the social processes in Western Europe during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages. The recent improvements of the curve of the geomagnetic field intensity will enhance the precision of the archaeomagnetic dating technique between 1200 and 200 BCE, because the variation of the intensity was fast during this period (Hervé et al 2013b(Hervé et al , 2016(Hervé et al , 2017.…”
Section: Posterior Dating Refinement Of Reference Data With Bayesian mentioning
confidence: 99%