2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11235-016-0178-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast handover solution for network-based distributed mobility management in intelligent transportation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, MROM assumes that old Exit Mobile Router (EMR1) and the new Exit Mobile Router (EMR2) act as Current Flowenabled MR (MRCF), and the New Flowenabled MR (MRNF), respectively. Both MRCF and MRNF devices are utilized for learning the changing of SMR across different wireless access routers [19][20] [21]. Moreover, MRCF and MRNF are responsible to the Mobile and Home Network Prefix (MNP and HNP) respectively, from the Acknowledgement (Ack) that is forwarded directly by the Proxy-HA (as FLMA).…”
Section: Proposed Mrom Based Multihomingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, MROM assumes that old Exit Mobile Router (EMR1) and the new Exit Mobile Router (EMR2) act as Current Flowenabled MR (MRCF), and the New Flowenabled MR (MRNF), respectively. Both MRCF and MRNF devices are utilized for learning the changing of SMR across different wireless access routers [19][20] [21]. Moreover, MRCF and MRNF are responsible to the Mobile and Home Network Prefix (MNP and HNP) respectively, from the Acknowledgement (Ack) that is forwarded directly by the Proxy-HA (as FLMA).…”
Section: Proposed Mrom Based Multihomingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, theses gathered metrics supports for enabling MRNF to forward (BU and BA) binding registration messages which containing MNP's MR option to Flow Local Mobility Anchor (FLMA) in order to complete the processing of Location Update (LU). Two binding registration messages namely, Early Proxy Binding Update (EPBU), and Early Proxy Binding Acknowledgement (EPBA) are encapsulated within HI and HAck messages, respectively to perform fast registration [21][22][23]. Moreover, a new field option is added to EPBU and EPBA that contains Flow Based Mobile Network Prefix (FMNP).…”
Section: Proposed Mrom Based Multihomingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of using FMIPv6 principles in DMM has also been substantiated by some recent works. It has been shown in [223] and [224] that extending DMM process through FMIPv6-based principles, such as proactive handover initiation, link-layer assistance, in-advanced new IP address formulation, buffering, and bidirectional tunneling, can outperform the popular PMIPv6-based DMM process. The study in [224] shows that fast handovers based DMM can achieve up to 74% reduction in handover latency compared to the PMIPv6-based DMM solution.…”
Section: B Standardization Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forwarding packets don't need to be passed to CMD, which is able to exchange PBU and PBA messages for setting up a tunnel between the old MAAR and the new MAAR. The authors in [12] proposed the fast handover DMM (FDMM), which uses the fast handover method over PMIPv6 (PFMIPv6) to reduce the handover latency by performing the handover initiation process for vehicular communication networks. The aim of FDMM is (1) to reduce the propagation time of MN's movement detection and (1) to reduce packet loss using the buffering packet mechanism in MAAR.…”
Section: Distributed Mobility Management (Dmm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have been proposed to resolve related problems existed in the DMM architecture [7,8]. Similarly to Centralized Mobility Management (CMM), the key obstacle for DMM is maintaining the on-going communications while mobile users roam among distinctive networks [9][10][11][12][13]. Even though a number of DMM-based studies have been proposed to have the more effective distributed operations targeting to resolve related mobility management problems, DMM still incurs high overhead, high handover latency, high packets loss and tunnel management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%