2021
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2021.3068574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Immune System-Inspired Hypermutation Operators for Combinatorial Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the approach adopted in the Nevergrad optimization platform [26]. Due to the binomial distribution being well-concentrated for n•p 1, getting rid of it as a proxy distribution leaves most of the properties of the algorithm intact, and allowing to flip up to n bits was shown to improve the performance in certain scenarios [27]. This mutation operator also flips a positive number of bits.…”
Section: A the (1+1) Ea With Binomial And Power-law Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the approach adopted in the Nevergrad optimization platform [26]. Due to the binomial distribution being well-concentrated for n•p 1, getting rid of it as a proxy distribution leaves most of the properties of the algorithm intact, and allowing to flip up to n bits was shown to improve the performance in certain scenarios [27]. This mutation operator also flips a positive number of bits.…”
Section: A the (1+1) Ea With Binomial And Power-law Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that the originally proposed operator flipped 𝑛 bits at every operation one by one and used a probability distribution very similar to (2) to determine whether to evaluate the solution after the 𝑀-th bit-flip and stopped the hypermutation as soon as an improvement was detected (i.e., stop at first constructive mutation). However, this is not necessary as shown in [11] and for a fairer comparison with the distribution of the Fast (1+1) AIS 𝛽 we remove this feature and only evaluate the solution once all the 𝑀 bits are flipped. If this hypermutation operator is used in the framework of Algorithm 1, we call the resulting algorithm Fast (1+1) AIS 𝑠𝛽 .…”
Section: Algorithms From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both algorithms exhibit their best performance at escaping local optima via large mutations when the parameter 𝛽 is set to a value close to 1. However, with such a parameter value, the operators lose effectiveness in conjunction with the ageing operator for escaping from local optima with large basins of attraction by accepting solutions of inferior quality, because the high mutation rates lead the algorithm back to the basin of attraction of the original local optimum with high probability [11].…”
Section: Algorithms From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the past decades, evolutionary algorithms have been extensively studied to solve the combinatorial optimization problems abstracted from real applications in various areas, including engineering, logistics, and economics. Although the theoretical understanding of the behavior of evolutionary algorithms (more specifically, their expected time) has achieved lots of progress, in particular, for the well-known Traveling Salesperson problem [1,2,3,4,5,6], Vertex Cover problem [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], Knapsack problem [18,19,20,21,22,23,24], Makespan Scheduling problem [25,26,27,28,29,30,31], and Minimum Spanning Tree problem [32,33,34,35,36,37], etc, its development still lags far behind its success in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%