2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast incremental learning of logistic model tree using least angle regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure of performance between the algorithms is provided by the AUC, which indicates how much a model is capable of distinguishing between classes: a model whose predictions are 100% wrong has an AUC of 0.0; one whose predictions are 100% correct has an AUC of 1.0. We compare the performance of the iSVM with two well-known incremental algorithms, the incremental Logistic Regression (iLR) [37] and an incremental artificial neural network, the incremental Radial Basis Function network (iRBF) [38]. The testing network used for the validation is composed by a requester interacting with nodes, as providers, that implement each a different behaviour, from benevolent to all of the seven possible attacks.…”
Section: B Simulation Results For ML Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of performance between the algorithms is provided by the AUC, which indicates how much a model is capable of distinguishing between classes: a model whose predictions are 100% wrong has an AUC of 0.0; one whose predictions are 100% correct has an AUC of 1.0. We compare the performance of the iSVM with two well-known incremental algorithms, the incremental Logistic Regression (iLR) [37] and an incremental artificial neural network, the incremental Radial Basis Function network (iRBF) [38]. The testing network used for the validation is composed by a requester interacting with nodes, as providers, that implement each a different behaviour, from benevolent to all of the seven possible attacks.…”
Section: B Simulation Results For ML Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known through the implantation process of Z‐yarns that applying tension to Z‐yarns can make the friction angle with the fibers in X and Y directions close to 90° when entering the preform, thus reducing the wear of fibers. [ 21 ] A tension control platform was designed, as shown in Figure 8, to achieve tension regulation by installing weights on one side of the fiber, but due to the frictional effect of the weights and pulleys, the weight of the weights cannot be equated to the tension, so a digital acquisition module was used to convert the weight of the weights into tension, as shown in Figure 9, the weight of the weights was F 1 , and the force F 1 ′ was generated by using a tension sensor to clamp one end of the Z‐yarn and drag it horizontally. Tension under different weights were recorded by the digital acquisition module, and the results are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Z‐yarn Wear Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee and Jun investigated the computational overhead for an updated version of a logistic model tree (LMT) [13]. LMT complements logistic regression with tree induction to harness the advantages of both algorithms.…”
Section: B Incremental and Non-incremental Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%