2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Local Planning and Mapping in Unknown Off-Road Terrain

Abstract: In this paper, we present a fast, on-line mapping and planning solution for operation in unknown, off-road, environments. We combine obstacle detection along with a terrain gradient map to make simple and adaptable cost map. This map can be created and updated at 10 Hz. An A* planner finds optimal paths over the map. Finally, we take multiple samples over the control input space and do a kinematic forward simulation to generated feasible trajectories. Then the most optimal trajectory, as determined by the cost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these methods provide cost estimates for specific scenarios, they struggle to adapt to off-road environments with complex road conditions and the incorporation of human driving preferences. In contrast, Tian et al (2023) constructs a potential field cost map based on obstacles and risks, while Overbye and Saripalli (2020) creates four temporary maps and produces a cost map through weighted averaging. Both approaches combine costs in a weighted manner to generate a single-value cost map; however, they fail to consider the relationships between costs and road conditions, as well as the relationships between different costs.…”
Section: Off-road Environment Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these methods provide cost estimates for specific scenarios, they struggle to adapt to off-road environments with complex road conditions and the incorporation of human driving preferences. In contrast, Tian et al (2023) constructs a potential field cost map based on obstacles and risks, while Overbye and Saripalli (2020) creates four temporary maps and produces a cost map through weighted averaging. Both approaches combine costs in a weighted manner to generate a single-value cost map; however, they fail to consider the relationships between costs and road conditions, as well as the relationships between different costs.…”
Section: Off-road Environment Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these single feature maps were not able to fully express various terrains such as undulations, roughness, ramps, and others in off-road scenarios. Overbye and Saripalli (2020) proposed to construct four types of feature maps for the environment and combine them with specific weights into one cost map. However, the combined map usually couples different features with an equal weights and fails to adapt to different types of terrain with different driving preference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elevation map, created by Lidar point clouds [25], [26], has been used to compute the geometrical features of the 3D surface [27], [28]. Using geometry-based traversability cost, local and global navigation algorithms have been proposed in [19], [29], [30]. However, such methods disregard the vehicleterrain interactions derived from the terrain conditions, such as friction coefficients.…”
Section: B Vehicle Navigation In View Of Traversabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost map process is a continuation on the methods developed in [23]. A lidar scan is taken over a local grid map.…”
Section: A Cost Map Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%