2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2015.7249247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast lossless traffic migration for SDN updates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, each link is assumed to have the capacity of 10 Mbps and delay of 200 ms. We consider the case of WAN optimization, where ingress switches split the traffic to a destination among its 4-shortest paths to pursue load balancing. Because of lacking real traffic matrices, we assume that all the possible paths of a sourcedestination share the equal weight initially, and use gravity model [4] to synthesize the current traffic demands, which make the maximum link load be 99% in the old configuration. Then, the update scenario is to reconfigure traffic split weights to the new one that reduces the maximum link load to the minimized value, 78%.…”
Section: Cup Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, each link is assumed to have the capacity of 10 Mbps and delay of 200 ms. We consider the case of WAN optimization, where ingress switches split the traffic to a destination among its 4-shortest paths to pursue load balancing. Because of lacking real traffic matrices, we assume that all the possible paths of a sourcedestination share the equal weight initially, and use gravity model [4] to synthesize the current traffic demands, which make the maximum link load be 99% in the old configuration. Then, the update scenario is to reconfigure traffic split weights to the new one that reduces the maximum link load to the minimized value, 78%.…”
Section: Cup Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the intermediate configurations they introduce will greatly complicate the update process, and might even disturb user's QoS-e.g., an intermediate path might have a larger latency than both the initial and target ones. In contrast, Dionysus [3] and ATOMIP [4] address the challenges by scheduling updates in thoughtful orders without bringing in additional stages. For instance, by executing the update illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several works have been inspired by the 2-Phase technique presented in [52]. One first line of research focuses on providing additional guarantees, e.g., congestion-freedom (from [53] to [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60]). In a second line of research, several algorithms [32], [61], [62], [63], [64] to compute a set of ordered rule replacements have been proposed to deal with specific SDN update cases (e.g., where only forwarding consistency is needed), avoiding the need for additional rules and hence enabling more resource-efficient approaches (e.g., TCAM memory slots are expensive and precious).…”
Section: Sdn Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%