OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158)
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2000.881327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast matching methods for inversion with underwater sound

Abstract: Matched-field processing approaches are powerful tools for source localization and environmental parameter estimation in the ocean.Requiring multiple replica field calculations, however, matched-field processing can have significant computational demands. This work investigates the potential for using matched-field techniques that match only select "features" of the acoustic fields, attempting to reduce the computational requirements for successful inversion. The features this paper focuses on are arrival time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that matching the locations with significant contributions in the delay-Doppler plane may be a reasonable criterion for quantifying the discrepancy between DDSFs, even at high frequencies. The approach proposed in [14], [15] for simple and robust inversion by matching the time difference between selected arrivals seems to be directly inspired by this. In our work we adopt an intermediate approach, discarding the phase information in DDSFs when evaluating discrepancies, but keeping the relative magnitudes of arrivals.…”
Section: B Ddsf Discrepancy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that matching the locations with significant contributions in the delay-Doppler plane may be a reasonable criterion for quantifying the discrepancy between DDSFs, even at high frequencies. The approach proposed in [14], [15] for simple and robust inversion by matching the time difference between selected arrivals seems to be directly inspired by this. In our work we adopt an intermediate approach, discarding the phase information in DDSFs when evaluating discrepancies, but keeping the relative magnitudes of arrivals.…”
Section: B Ddsf Discrepancy Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matching DDSFs is envisaged for estimating geometric information such as source-receiver positions, velocities, and water depth, as modeling uncertainties at high frequencies seem too large to recover more subtle properties such as bottom composition. The framework is reminiscent of [14], [15], where the delays between selected multipath arrivals were used to invert for the source position through a modelbased approach. In our work sparse DDSF estimation for single-carrier communications is used to obtain a "skeleton" of the acoustic field, including dynamic information on relative velocities from the Doppler shifts observed on different paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the literature appears to treat other problems with elegant approaches where some of the variables are known without error ͑such as some or all of the receiver coordinates͒ and/or some linear approximation is adopted. 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20] The approach taken here has its root in a method for estimating the distribution of an animal's location given realistic a priori estimates for the distributions of sound speed, receiver locations, and measurement error. 9 We explain how that approach can be generalized to estimate the distributions of all the variables and how to include dynamical models for the evolution of all variables between the receptions of different animal calls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%