2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Multi-Level Foreground Estimation

Abstract: Alpha matting aims to estimate the translucency of an object in a given image. The resulting alpha matte describes pixel-wise to what amount foreground and background colors contribute to the color of the composite image. While most methods in literature focus on estimating the alpha matte, the process of estimating the foreground colors given the input image and its alpha matte is often neglected, although foreground estimation is an essential part of many image editing workflows. In this work, we propose a n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. For the variants (FG w/ [13]) and (FG w/ [12]), they report similar results to the complete model (w * , n * ), which indicates that our method is not sensitive to the foreground estimation methods. The variant (FG w/ GT α) presents a similar performance with foreground estimation using the enhanced matte (w * , n * ).…”
Section: F Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. For the variants (FG w/ [13]) and (FG w/ [12]), they report similar results to the complete model (w * , n * ), which indicates that our method is not sensitive to the foreground estimation methods. The variant (FG w/ GT α) presents a similar performance with foreground estimation using the enhanced matte (w * , n * ).…”
Section: F Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 53%
“…We first compare with six variants: 1) optimizing the latent code w only while keeping the noise code n fixed (w * , n); 2) optimizing the noise code n only (w, n * ); 3) without the entropy #2). Furthermore, for evaluating the influence of different foreground estimation methods, we use MLFgE [13] and Blur-Fusion [12] instead of Closed-form Matting [27] for the foreground estimation respectively, resulting in two variants: 9) FG w/ [13] and 10) FG w/ [12]. 11) We also use the GT matte instead of enhanced matte for the foreground estimation used in Eq.…”
Section: F Ablation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method achieves more accurate matting results, especially around thin and detailed structures, compared to prior work. We extracted the foreground using the technique proposed by Germer et al[Germer et al 2021] and composited it onto a new background sampled from a public background database].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%