2019 27th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2019.8902557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Multichannel Source Separation Based on Jointly Diagonalizable Spatial Covariance Matrices

Abstract: This paper describes a versatile method that accelerates multichannel source separation methods based on full-rank spatial modeling. A popular approach to multichannel source separation is to integrate a spatial model with a source model for estimating the spatial covariance matrices (SCMs) and power spectral densities (PSDs) of each sound source in the time-frequency domain. One of the most successful examples of this approach is multichannel nonnegative matrix factorization (MNMF) based on a full-rank spatia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have been proposed to restrict the SCMs of sources to JD yet full-rank matrices for multichannel BSS. Ito and Nakatani proposed a fast version of FCA called Fast-FCA [28], [29] and then proposed a fast version of MNMF called FastMNMF1 [20] independently and concurrently with our work [19]. To estimate a non-singular matrix called diagonalizer used for jointly diagonalizing the SCMs of sources at each frequency bin, we used a convergence-guaranteed IP method as in FastCTF [37], while a fixed point iteration (FPI) method without convergence guarantee was used in [20].…”
Section: B Bss Methods Based On Full-rank Spatial Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have been proposed to restrict the SCMs of sources to JD yet full-rank matrices for multichannel BSS. Ito and Nakatani proposed a fast version of FCA called Fast-FCA [28], [29] and then proposed a fast version of MNMF called FastMNMF1 [20] independently and concurrently with our work [19]. To estimate a non-singular matrix called diagonalizer used for jointly diagonalizing the SCMs of sources at each frequency bin, we used a convergence-guaranteed IP method as in FastCTF [37], while a fixed point iteration (FPI) method without convergence guarantee was used in [20].…”
Section: B Bss Methods Based On Full-rank Spatial Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an intermediate (over)determined (M ≥ N ) BSS method between MNMF and ILRMA, we proposed a computationallyefficient variant of MNMF called FastMNMF1 that restricts all source SCMs of each frequency bin to jointly-diagonalizable (JD) yet full-rank matrices [19]. Note that another FastMNMF1 based on the same formulation had been developed independently and concurrently [20].…”
Section: Mnmf Fastmnmf1 Fastmnmf2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of these update rules are described in [7]. [13,19] In convolutive BSS, the frequency-domain instantaneous mixing process is translated into a model using a rank-1 spatial covariance matrix aina H in for each source. In this case, the observed signal xij is modeled as follows:…”
Section: Ilrma [7]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm the efficacy of the proposed method, we conducted a BSS experiment using a simulated mixture of a target speech source and diffuse noise. We compared seven methods, namely, ILRMA [5], BSSA [19], the original MNMF [11], MNMF initialized by ILRMA (ILRMA+MNMF) [5], [15], the original FastMNMF [14], FastMNMF initialized by ILRMA (ILRMA+FastMNMF), and the proposed method (α = 0.7 and β = 10 −16 were selected experimentally). In ILRMA, the observation x ij was preprocessed via a sphering transformation using PCA.…”
Section: A Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%