2021
DOI: 10.1121/10.0006102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast multipole accelerated boundary element methods for room acoustics

Abstract: Direct and indirect boundary element methods, accelerated via the fast multipole method, are applied to numerical simulation of room acoustics for rooms of volume ∼150 m3 and frequencies up to 5 kHz on a workstation. As the parameter kD (wavenumber times room diameter) is large, stabilization of the previously developed fast algorithms is required for accuracy. A stabilization scheme is one of the key contributions of this paper. The computations are validated using well-known image source solutions for shoebo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods in a different domain also have unique strengths and weaknesses. FEM (Otsuru et al, 2000;Otsuru et al, 2001;Okamoto et al, 2007;Aretz and Vorländer, 2014;Okuzono and Sakagami, 2018;Murillo et al, 2019;Hoshi et al, 2020;Yatabe and Sugahara, 2022) and BEM (Yasuda et al, 2016;Yasuda et al, 2020;Gumerov and Duraiswami, 2021;Cardoso Soares et al, 2022) are standard selection as a numerical method in the former frequency-domain simulations. Frequency-domain (FD) methods have an inherent benefit for use in modeling sound absorbers (Cox and Peter, 2017) such as porous-type and resonant-type materials accurately: they can deal naturally with complex-valued frequency-dependent quantities such as specific acoustic admittance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods in a different domain also have unique strengths and weaknesses. FEM (Otsuru et al, 2000;Otsuru et al, 2001;Okamoto et al, 2007;Aretz and Vorländer, 2014;Okuzono and Sakagami, 2018;Murillo et al, 2019;Hoshi et al, 2020;Yatabe and Sugahara, 2022) and BEM (Yasuda et al, 2016;Yasuda et al, 2020;Gumerov and Duraiswami, 2021;Cardoso Soares et al, 2022) are standard selection as a numerical method in the former frequency-domain simulations. Frequency-domain (FD) methods have an inherent benefit for use in modeling sound absorbers (Cox and Peter, 2017) such as porous-type and resonant-type materials accurately: they can deal naturally with complex-valued frequency-dependent quantities such as specific acoustic admittance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency domain BEM is known as a convenient numerical method for unbounded acoustic problems as its integral equation inherently satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation condition [11]. The fast multipole method (FMM) [12] enables BEM to handle large acoustic models at high frequencies, thus making it more efficient in solving large bounded problems such as room acoustics [13,14,15]. As a classical time-domain simulation method, FDTD has shown good capabilities in a wide range of acoustic applications including room acoustic simulations [1,16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation methods for acoustic fields include the finite element method, the boundary element method, the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method, and geometric acoustics [6][7][8][9][10][11]. The FDTD method, which was developed for electromagnetic field analysis, can be used to analyze time evolution problems from the perspective of wave acoustics [1,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%