2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast radiation mapping and multiple source localization using topographic contour map and incremental density estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a UAV for multiple source localization and contour mapping (e.g., for fast emergency response) was also proposed by Newaz et al [ 173 , 174 ]. When considering multiple sources, each of them contributes in a cumulative manner for a given hotspot, which differs from the situation in which each source is considered individually.…”
Section: Mobile Radiation Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a UAV for multiple source localization and contour mapping (e.g., for fast emergency response) was also proposed by Newaz et al [ 173 , 174 ]. When considering multiple sources, each of them contributes in a cumulative manner for a given hotspot, which differs from the situation in which each source is considered individually.…”
Section: Mobile Radiation Detection Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar problem is locating regions of interest (ROI), where the objective is to ensure some target exists within an area [19]. Given information about received sensor strength, we see some approaches map contours and perform a gradient descent method to locate the signal source.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefited from the multi-layer structure, the proposed method embeds the candidated centroids into the Poisson based detection model, and this improvement provides theoretical foundation for the mixed multi-source localization problem, which is infeasible and impracticable in existing research [ 16 , 20 , 31 ]. Furthermore, this weighting model is adopted alone in the confidence calculation step (as described in Section 4.5 ), while peak suppressed factor and swarm distance factor are just employed in the weighting process.…”
Section: Proposed Algorithm Designmentioning
confidence: 99%