2017
DOI: 10.1127/metz/2016/0781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast radiative transfer parameterisation for assessing the surface solar irradiance: The Heliosat‑4 method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation of this is that the GSIP model reports lower G s under clear-sky conditions, especially around solar noon (low solar zenith angle), when the solar irradiance values are the highest [17]. The correlation coefficients are the smallest at the largest solar zenith angle interval, which could be a result of less accuracy in the retrieval of cloud properties from satellites ( Figure 8) [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible explanation of this is that the GSIP model reports lower G s under clear-sky conditions, especially around solar noon (low solar zenith angle), when the solar irradiance values are the highest [17]. The correlation coefficients are the smallest at the largest solar zenith angle interval, which could be a result of less accuracy in the retrieval of cloud properties from satellites ( Figure 8) [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Also, for both sites the uncertainties in the estimation of cloud properties (cover, type and layer) could also be another source of error. The rapid changes in cloud cover can be inferred from the ground measurements, especially at the finer resolution at the ASF site [40,41]. The different areas that the satellite sensor and ground pyranometer represent could also cause some error, especially for partially cloud-covered conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new Heliosat-4 method differs from the previous Heliosat methods (Qu et al, 2016) in its concept. It adopts the approximation of Oumbe et al (2014) where the SSI is approximated by the product of the McClear SSI by a modification factor which depends on solar zenith angle, cloud properties and ground albedo.…”
Section: The Family Of Heliosat Methods the Helioclim Databases And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAMS radiation service v2 data set, abbreviated in CRS, is generated by processing images of the Meteosat second generation by the Heliosat 4 method (Qu et al, 2017). The geographical and temporal coverages as well as the spatial and temporal resolutions are the same than HC3v5.…”
Section: The Cams Radiation Service V2 Data Set (Crs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAMS Radiation Service provides a classification of the clouds in four types as a function of the altitude (Qu et al, 2017):…”
Section: The Cams Cloud Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%