2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-015-2065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast-response underwater TSP investigation of subcritical instabilities of a cylinder in crossflow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 2D/3D flows, the increase/decrease in the variation range with increasing Re is mainly induced by the increase/decrease in strength of the separating shear layer and hence the cross-flow roll-up of the separating shear layer with increasing Re. While the present study focuses primarily on the early 3D flow states up to Re = 1000, time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at a much higher Re of 7.4×10 4 are available from the experimental study by Capone et al (2015), which enables a similar analysis at this much higher Re. Capone et al (2015) plotted the time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at Re = 7.4×10 4 at two spanwise locations over approximately 45 vortex shedding cycles.…”
Section: Please Cite Thismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 2D/3D flows, the increase/decrease in the variation range with increasing Re is mainly induced by the increase/decrease in strength of the separating shear layer and hence the cross-flow roll-up of the separating shear layer with increasing Re. While the present study focuses primarily on the early 3D flow states up to Re = 1000, time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at a much higher Re of 7.4×10 4 are available from the experimental study by Capone et al (2015), which enables a similar analysis at this much higher Re. Capone et al (2015) plotted the time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at Re = 7.4×10 4 at two spanwise locations over approximately 45 vortex shedding cycles.…”
Section: Please Cite Thismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the present study focuses primarily on the early 3D flow states up to Re = 1000, time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at a much higher Re of 7.4×10 4 are available from the experimental study by Capone et al (2015), which enables a similar analysis at this much higher Re. Capone et al (2015) plotted the time histories of the instantaneous separation angle at Re = 7.4×10 4 at two spanwise locations over approximately 45 vortex shedding cycles. The averages of the maxima and minima of θs for the first time history are 78.1° and 75.0°, respectively, while those for the second time history are 78.2° and 75.1°, respectively, which suggest that the variation range of the instantaneous separation angle remains small (of approximately 3.1°) at Re = 7.4×10 4 .…”
Section: Please Cite Thismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present experiment, the maximum temperature difference between fluid and surface is reached in the laminar flow in the valley region just before transition (the location of largestĪref/Ī in Fig. 6 a)) and is smaller than 1 K. To quantify the influence of the buoyancy forces caused by the non-adiabatic wall the Richardson number is used, see also Sabatino and Smith (2008) and Capone et al (2015). The Richardson number Ri is equal to the Grashof number Gr x divided by Reynolds number Re 2…”
Section: Errorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…cryogenic facilities , rotating systems (Weiss et al, 2017), and low-speed atmospheric wind tunnels (Lemarechal et al, 2018a). It has also been used for visualizations on a cylinder in crossflow in water facilities at different Reynolds numbers (Fey et al, 2013;Capone et al, 2015). In these experiments, the oscillation of the separation line and flow structures influencing the skin friction were visualized on the cylinder surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second methodology relies on the link between the propagation celerity of temperature perturbations and the friction velocity [ 25 , 57 , 58 ]. These TSP-based methodologies have been successfully applied to identify the critical lines in low-speed flows [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%