2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Room Temperature Very Low Field-Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Compatible with MagnetoEncephaloGraphy Environment

Abstract: In recent years, ultra-low field (ULF)-MRI is being given more and more attention, due to the possibility of integrating ULF-MRI and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in the same device. Despite the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) reduction, there are several advantages to operating at ULF, including increased tissue contrast, reduced cost and weight of the scanners, the potential to image patients that are not compatible with clinical scanners, and the opportunity to integrate different imaging modalities. The majorit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the clear market for a low-cost, portable MRI scanner, particularly in the field of emergency medicine, has led to the design and construction of several prototype MRI scanners that operate at low magnetic fields (<0.3 T) (4), where it becomes economically advantageous to generate the main B 0 magnetic field with permanent magnets (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Further reduction of B 0 into the ultra-low field regime (ULF; B 0 <10 mT) (12) makes possible MRI scanners based on inexpensive, and lightweight, electromagnets (13)(14)(15)(16). Using modern hardware and new acquisition techniques, this new wave of low-cost scanners can acquire far superior diagnostic information (13) to earlier generations of low-field MRI scanners (17) and could become common screening tools, particularly at remote hospitals and medical clinics (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the clear market for a low-cost, portable MRI scanner, particularly in the field of emergency medicine, has led to the design and construction of several prototype MRI scanners that operate at low magnetic fields (<0.3 T) (4), where it becomes economically advantageous to generate the main B 0 magnetic field with permanent magnets (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Further reduction of B 0 into the ultra-low field regime (ULF; B 0 <10 mT) (12) makes possible MRI scanners based on inexpensive, and lightweight, electromagnets (13)(14)(15)(16). Using modern hardware and new acquisition techniques, this new wave of low-cost scanners can acquire far superior diagnostic information (13) to earlier generations of low-field MRI scanners (17) and could become common screening tools, particularly at remote hospitals and medical clinics (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VLF MRIs were recorded on a prototype operating at a static field of 8.9 mT inside a magnetically shielded room [ 6 ]. We used a Spin Echo (SE) sequence, cartesian sampling with 1×1×1 mm 3 resolution, 6.4×6.4×6.4 cm 3 FOV, TR = 500 ms, TE = 19 ms, NEX = 37 and total acquisition time of 8.5 min for each volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 15 years, new instrumental apparatuses have been developed to perform Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at low fields (LF MRI, B < 10 mT), in contrast to the general tendency to increase the magnetic field strength for higher spatial resolution (see [ 1 , 2 ] for reviews on actual LF NMR/MRI instruments and applications). These devices operate at field levels ranging from ~1 μT (Ultra Low Field, ULF [ 3 , 4 ]) to ~10 mT (Very Low Field, VLF [ 3 6 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the resonant frequency becomes low as in the present case, the standard RF birdcage coil will possess very low inductance L. Tuning such a coil toward resonance at low frequencies would require large capacitance C. This, however, means a low Q-factor (quality factor Q L C R = / / is the "gain" of the series resonator) and higher costs, as well as higher fabrication complexity [83,84], and will restrict the use of the conventional birdcage coil to frequencies above at least a few megahertz. Different methods to overcome this difficulty have been suggested [83][84][85][86][87][88], but they are all limited to small-size coils.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Coil Resonator Design Solenoidal E-fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%