2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast selection of geologic models honoring CO2 plume monitoring data using Hausdorff distance and scaled connectivity analysis

Abstract: The spatial and temporal characteristics of observed CO 2 plumes obtained from 4D seismic surveys can be honored by finding the most probable models in which the migration of CO 2 plumes are spatially and temporally similar to the observation. A computationally efficient scheme is necessary to assess the dissimilarity between CO 2 plumes simulated over a large suite of geologic models, and subsequently to select the subset of models exhibiting characteristics similar to the observation. The Euclidean distance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate the degree of resemblance between the reference spiral and cohort's drawing, we introduced features related to the Hausdorff distance, which quantify the extent to which each point in the reference spiral lies near the points in the cohort's drawing following procedures illustrated (9,(25)(26)(27). Similar to Figure 3 in Jeong and Srinivasan (27), a detailed example procedure to calculate the Hausdorff distance of the reference and cohort's drawing is presented in Supplementary Figure S1. We point out that the Hausdorff distance was calculated using the "metric.hausdorff " function in the fda.usc R software package (28).…”
Section: Feature Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the degree of resemblance between the reference spiral and cohort's drawing, we introduced features related to the Hausdorff distance, which quantify the extent to which each point in the reference spiral lies near the points in the cohort's drawing following procedures illustrated (9,(25)(26)(27). Similar to Figure 3 in Jeong and Srinivasan (27), a detailed example procedure to calculate the Hausdorff distance of the reference and cohort's drawing is presented in Supplementary Figure S1. We point out that the Hausdorff distance was calculated using the "metric.hausdorff " function in the fda.usc R software package (28).…”
Section: Feature Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. Creagh et al, 2020; Dubuisson & Jain, 1994; Huttenlocher, Klanderman, & Rucklidge, 1993; Jeong & Srinivasan, 2017). Similar to Figure 3 in (Jeong & Srinivasan, 2017), a detail example procedure to calculate the Hausdorff distance of the reference and cohort’s drawing is presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the degree of resemblance between the reference spiral and cohort's drawing, we introduced features related to the Hausdorff distance, which quantify the extent to which each point in the reference spiral lies near the points in the cohort's drawing following procedures illustrated in (A. P. Creagh et al, 2020;Dubuisson & Jain, 1994;Huttenlocher, Klanderman, & Rucklidge, 1993;Jeong & Srinivasan, 2017). Similar to Figure 3 in (Jeong & Srinivasan, 2017), a detail example procedure to calculate the Hausdorff distance of the reference and cohort's drawing is presented in Figure 2. Prior to calculating the Hausdorff distance, the x and y screen coordinate points of the reference spiral were interpolated to the length of the cohort's drawing's coordinates using cubic spline interpolation (Fritsch & Carlson, 1980;Hyman, 1983;McKinley & Levine, 1998).…”
Section: Clinical Assessments Of Motor Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational costs associated with simulating these aspects of CCS can be prohibitive, necessitating the use of surrogate models. Although a large number of surrogate modeling studies have been conducted for CCS in the context of risk assessment, sensitivity analysis, UQ, and monitoring network design (Dai et al, ; Jeong & Srinivasan, , ; Keating et al, ; Oladyshkin et al, ; Pawar et al, ; Sun et al, , ), development of high‐fidelity surrogate models remains a challenging subject in the high‐dimensional decision space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%