2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/219/3/032053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast simulation of the CMS detector

Abstract: The CMS collaboration has developed a fast Monte Carlo simulation of the CMS detector with event production rates 100-1000 times faster than the GEANT4-based simulation, with comparable accuracy. This paper discusses the simulation of particle propagation in the CMS detector and the response of the different parts of the detector: the silicon tracker, the electromagnetic calorimeter, the hadronic calorimeter and the muon system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gluinos and squarks decay according to phase space [65]. To render the computational requirements manageable, the detector response is described using the CMS fast simulation [66,67], which yields consistent results with the GEANT4-based simulation, except that we apply a correction of 1% to account for differences in the efficiency of the jet quality requirements [37], corrections of 5-12% to account for differences in the b jet tagging efficiency, and corrections of 0-14% to account for differences in the modeling of H T and H miss T .…”
Section: Simulated Event Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gluinos and squarks decay according to phase space [65]. To render the computational requirements manageable, the detector response is described using the CMS fast simulation [66,67], which yields consistent results with the GEANT4-based simulation, except that we apply a correction of 1% to account for differences in the efficiency of the jet quality requirements [37], corrections of 5-12% to account for differences in the b jet tagging efficiency, and corrections of 0-14% to account for differences in the modeling of H T and H miss T .…”
Section: Simulated Event Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal production cross sections are computed [119][120][121][122][123] with NLO plus next-to-leading-logarithm (NLL) accuracy. To reduce computational requirements, the detector is modeled with the CMS fast simulation program [124,125], which yields consistent results compared with the GEANT4-based simulation, except that we apply a correction of 1% to account for differences in the efficiency of the jet quality requirements [126], and corrections of 3-10% to account for differences in the b-jet tagging efficiency.…”
Section: Event Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We simulate ED in the ADD model using the sherpa (v1.1.2) [17] MC generator, which samples different operating points in M S and n ED , followed by a fast parametric simulation of the CMS detector [18]. A fast simulation is adequate for describing multiphoton final states and has been extensively validated using full simulation of the detector via geant4 [19].…”
Section: Signal and Background Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%