2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.103882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast simulation of two-phase flow in three-dimensional digital images of heterogeneous porous media using multiresolution curvelet transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conjunction, two-phase flow simulations at the pore scale have also been carried out extensively (Zhao et al 2019) with the aim of reproducing both microscopic and macroscopic observations. These have been performed using various representations of porous structures like pore networks (Gjennestad, Winkler & Hansen 2020;Maalal et al 2021), X-ray or scanning-electron-microscopy-based images (Aljasmi & Sahimi 2021;Shams et al 2021). Computations have been carried out in many different configurations using lattice-Boltzmann (Taghilou & Rahimian 2014;Shi & Tang 2018;Gu, Liu & Wu 2021) and other techniques, either based on two-fluid systems taking explicitly into account the interfaces with a volume of fluid method or continuous two-fluid approaches using level-set (Ambekar, Mondal & Buwa 2021;Jettestuen, Friis & Helland 2021) or Cahn-Hilliard models (Yang & Kim 2021) with improved algorithms making use of machine learning (see, for instance, Silva et al (2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conjunction, two-phase flow simulations at the pore scale have also been carried out extensively (Zhao et al 2019) with the aim of reproducing both microscopic and macroscopic observations. These have been performed using various representations of porous structures like pore networks (Gjennestad, Winkler & Hansen 2020;Maalal et al 2021), X-ray or scanning-electron-microscopy-based images (Aljasmi & Sahimi 2021;Shams et al 2021). Computations have been carried out in many different configurations using lattice-Boltzmann (Taghilou & Rahimian 2014;Shi & Tang 2018;Gu, Liu & Wu 2021) and other techniques, either based on two-fluid systems taking explicitly into account the interfaces with a volume of fluid method or continuous two-fluid approaches using level-set (Ambekar, Mondal & Buwa 2021;Jettestuen, Friis & Helland 2021) or Cahn-Hilliard models (Yang & Kim 2021) with improved algorithms making use of machine learning (see, for instance, Silva et al (2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been performed using various representations of porous structures like pore networks (Gjennestad, Winkler & Hansen 2020; Maalal et al. 2021), X-ray or scanning-electron-microscopy-based images (Aljasmi & Sahimi 2021; Shams et al. 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pore network modeling (PNM) is a micro, multiphase flow -method based on physical reality [21]. In the field of hydrocarbon resources development, various forms of pore network models have been widely used in the simulation and prediction of single or multiphase flow parameters in porous rock media, such as capillary force [22], relative permeability [23], residual oil saturation [24], reservoir recovery [25], etc. PNM is also a simulation tool based on the actual physical existence of multiphase flow in porous media [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%