2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39658-1_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Smallest-Enclosing-Ball Computation in High Dimensions

Abstract: Abstract. We develop a simple combinatorial algorithm for computing the smallest enclosing ball of a set of points in high dimensional Euclidean space. The resulting code is in most cases faster (sometimes significantly) than recent dedicated methods that only deliver approximate results, and it beats off-the-shelf solutions, based e.g. on quadratic programming solvers. The algorithm resembles the simplex algorithm for linear programming; it comes with a Bland-type rule to avoid cycling in presence of degenera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fast algorithms for the smallest ball problem exist. See [12] for theoretical discussion and [14] for downloadable algorithms from the web. 4.…”
Section: Computing the Homology Of Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast algorithms for the smallest ball problem exist. See [12] for theoretical discussion and [14] for downloadable algorithms from the web. 4.…”
Section: Computing the Homology Of Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact algorithms of MEB Traditional exact MEB algorithms can not effectively deal with high-dimensional data. For example, prune-and-search algorithm proposed by Megiddo, heuristic-based move-to-front algorithm proposed by Welzl, quadratic programming method proposed by GÄartner, the F-G-K algorithm proposed by Fischer [16]. We briefly present the iteration strategy of F-G-K algorithm below, called the dropping and walking (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Review On Meb Algorithms a Formulation Of Mebmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding MEB is a well-studied computational geometry problem and efficient solutions exist for problems with up to a few hundred dimensions. We use an efficient implementation of Fischer et al [6] to compute MEBs. Finally, we normalize this intersection and convert it to a functional similarity score.…”
Section: Glu R1 R2mentioning
confidence: 99%