2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44051-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Swept Volume Estimation with Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we briefly demonstrate that swept volume geometries ( S V ( c 1 , c 2 ) ) can be accurately and efficiently estimated by DNNs. This paper extends our previous work (Chiang et al 2018) through the following additional contributions. First, we comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of DNN distance measure learning on seven robots, encompassing rigid-body, prismatic, and revolute joints and closed-loop kinematic chain motion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Second, we briefly demonstrate that swept volume geometries ( S V ( c 1 , c 2 ) ) can be accurately and efficiently estimated by DNNs. This paper extends our previous work (Chiang et al 2018) through the following additional contributions. First, we comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of DNN distance measure learning on seven robots, encompassing rigid-body, prismatic, and revolute joints and closed-loop kinematic chain motion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…One approach seeks to identify and evaluate only important regions of the robot's state space, thus reducing the number of required collision checks. Some methods learn heuristics for promising paths [25], [5], learn a distribution of promising regions [18], or evaluate only the most promising edges [6]. Our approach, which learns to accelerate the actual collision checking procedure, is complementary and can be used in conjunction with these approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, our chance constraints are also influenced by the cross-communication uncertainty of a heterogeneous robot team (see III-B). Additionally, while obstacle constraints can be explicitly used in the optimization, other works show a learning-based approach to avoid collisions by modeling the distribution of promising regions for travel [10] or predicting the separation distance between the robot and its surroundings [11]. Our work is a hybrid approach, where we use the RNN to predict uncertainty of state estimates (which affect the 'size' of polyhedral obstacles), but still use these obstacles as constraints in our SMPC optimization.…”
Section: Relative Distances To Obstacles/global Goalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 14) returns a positive distance if the robot is 'outside' the obstacle boundary, and a negative distance if the robot is 'inside' the obstacle boundary (a negative distance would cause the line constraint to fail). By definition of constraint (10), only one or more of the line constraints need to be satisfied per obstacle O j , which is ensured by using binary integer variables under constraints ( 15) and ( 16) (e.g., for line constraint i belonging to O j , if I i,j = 1, the robot is outside this obstacle). For simplicity, we assume we have a 'perfect' object detection system.…”
Section: A Stochastic Model Predictive Control Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%