2019
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2019.0507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast target deception jamming method against spaceborne synthetic aperture radar based on equivalent bistatic scattered fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the range from the SAR to the deceptive target is usually much larger than the size of the target, R t (t a ) can be approximately equal to the summation of the range from the origin to the radar, denoted by R o (t a ), and the projection of the vector from the origin to the point on the vector of directed from the radar to the origin [11]. It can be denoted by [19] R t (η) ≈ R(η)…”
Section: The Proposed Methods a Fast Em Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because the range from the SAR to the deceptive target is usually much larger than the size of the target, R t (t a ) can be approximately equal to the summation of the range from the origin to the radar, denoted by R o (t a ), and the projection of the vector from the origin to the point on the vector of directed from the radar to the origin [11]. It can be denoted by [19] R t (η) ≈ R(η)…”
Section: The Proposed Methods a Fast Em Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, if you consider a detailed object model, the former part not only consumes most of the computing resources, but also needs to be performed for each observation angle when calculating the monostatic scattered fields. By constrast, it is more efficient to obtain the bistatic scattered field data because ray tracing is performed only once for the incident direction and only the EM calculation are required for each viewing angle [11].…”
Section: The Proposed Methods a Fast Em Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation