2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0855-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast transmission from the dopaminergic ventral midbrain to the sensory cortex of awake primates

Abstract: Motivated by the increasing evidence that auditory cortex is under control of dopaminergic cell structures of the ventral midbrain, we studied how the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra affect neuronal activity in auditory cortex. We electrically stimulated 567 deep brain sites in total within and in the vicinity of the two dopaminergic ventral midbrain structures and at the same time, recorded local field potentials and neuronal discharges in cortex. In experiments conducted on three awake macaque mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AEP at latencies longer than 148 ms was not considered to avoid the electrical artifact in the EA_750 condition in which the electrical stimulation of the next trial was presented 150 ms after the onset of the noise burst of the present trial. The EA_0 condition was not analyzed for possible modulations of the AEP because we were not able to disentangle the electrically induced modulations from the direct interactions between the AEP and the electrically evoked potential (Mylius et al 2014), using an approach similar to the one used previously to assess interactions between two sequential tones (Brosch et al 1999). This is in contrast to the multiunit activity, for which we were able to analyze modulations of the driven firing in the EA_0 condition because only a few sites had overlapping electrically and auditory evoked firing (Mylius et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The AEP at latencies longer than 148 ms was not considered to avoid the electrical artifact in the EA_750 condition in which the electrical stimulation of the next trial was presented 150 ms after the onset of the noise burst of the present trial. The EA_0 condition was not analyzed for possible modulations of the AEP because we were not able to disentangle the electrically induced modulations from the direct interactions between the AEP and the electrically evoked potential (Mylius et al 2014), using an approach similar to the one used previously to assess interactions between two sequential tones (Brosch et al 1999). This is in contrast to the multiunit activity, for which we were able to analyze modulations of the driven firing in the EA_0 condition because only a few sites had overlapping electrically and auditory evoked firing (Mylius et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both monkeys were also used in our previous study (Mylius et al 2014). Since methods were mostly the same in both studies, we briefly summarize the common methods and describe in detail only the specific methods of the current report.…”
Section: Subjects and Animal Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations