2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast two‐dimensional subset censored CFAR method for multiple objects detection from acoustic image

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, background noise distribution estimation is very important for target detection. Compared with the lognormal distribution and K-distribution, the Weibull distribution provides a trade-off between the accuracy of modeling and computational cost [2]. For these reasons, the Weibull distribution is more suitable to describe the statistical properties of this type of background noise.…”
Section: Background Noise Distribution Estimation Of Multibeammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, background noise distribution estimation is very important for target detection. Compared with the lognormal distribution and K-distribution, the Weibull distribution provides a trade-off between the accuracy of modeling and computational cost [2]. For these reasons, the Weibull distribution is more suitable to describe the statistical properties of this type of background noise.…”
Section: Background Noise Distribution Estimation Of Multibeammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the constant exploration of oceans, multibeam sonar (MBS) is being applied in many scenarios, such as underwater environment mapping [1], underwater target detection [2], and underwater terrain-aided navigation [3]. However, noise interference is strong in water, which makes it more difficult to extract useful information from the images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector is regarded as the classical radar detector for automotive radar [4]. To deal with the impact caused by typical problems of CFAR such as the masking effects and computation complexity, some modified methods [5][6][7] based on cell averaging (CA)-CFAR or ordered statistic (OS)-CFAR are proposed. However, when applied to the complex scenes in autonomous driving, for example, in a high-density clutter environment such as the guardrails, tunnels, and soundproof walls, the performance of CFAR detector decreases dramatically as the number of clutter points increase a lot [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) represents an adaptive technique able to perform accurate and robust target detection. This technique is commonly used in radar technology for detecting moving objects [9, 10] as well also in sonar technology applied in acoustic images from different sonar devices for multi‐target detection [11–13], underwater pipeline detection on the seafloor [14, 15], acoustic segmentation of several types of regions [16], among others. CFAR calculates an adaptive detection threshold from interference power values to maintain an expected false alarm probability [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of OS‐CFAR is its computational effort because sorting is a time‐consuming task. This computational effort prevents its use in real‐time applications [11], and therefore the utility of OS‐CFAR technique decreases. In addition, a two‐dimensional (2D) sliding window is necessary to consider more contextual information and hence to improve detections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%