2017
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.117.017673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Versus Slow Progressors of Infarct Growth in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
192
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
5
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with LPS, poor collateralization—a marker of fast infarct growth30—is indicative of a high likelihood that the ischemic lesion is already completely established, and it has been clearly associated with poor outcomes even with successful recanalization 31. In our study, the proportion of patients with favorable collateral status in the group treated within 6 hours was similar to the WUS/LPS group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For patients with LPS, poor collateralization—a marker of fast infarct growth30—is indicative of a high likelihood that the ischemic lesion is already completely established, and it has been clearly associated with poor outcomes even with successful recanalization 31. In our study, the proportion of patients with favorable collateral status in the group treated within 6 hours was similar to the WUS/LPS group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Significant modifications by time on the effect of EVT was demonstrated in Figure 2b, which also corroborated the concept of the late window paradox and slow progressor of infarction [4, 20]. In our center, evaluation and management of acute cerebral LVO patients were done without expensive perfusion quantification tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The results of the DAWN trial have shown that there exists a proportion of patients with LVO strokes who have enough collateral support to sustain a penumbra and harbor small ischemic cores (‘slow progressors') 9. The median change in ischemic core volume at 24 hours in the DAWN control arm was 13 mL (median infarct growth rate of 0.5 mL/hour) 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%