2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2011.6094902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast visual people tracking using a feature-based people detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [18], they presented a tracking algorithm that combines the mean‐shift and particle‐Kalman filter. In [38], they introduce an approach that makes human detection by the fast version of an implicit shape model detector, which is trained on people. In [39], they proposed the tracker based on the point matching method; the point‐based features will be extracted first and be corrected by the DBScan algorithm, and then construct an object model as the tracker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], they presented a tracking algorithm that combines the mean‐shift and particle‐Kalman filter. In [38], they introduce an approach that makes human detection by the fast version of an implicit shape model detector, which is trained on people. In [39], they proposed the tracker based on the point matching method; the point‐based features will be extracted first and be corrected by the DBScan algorithm, and then construct an object model as the tracker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fifth assumption has been observed in social studies carried out on human motion behavior (Nourbakhsh et al, 2003). The sixth assumption is difficult to verify at the present time because, although there exist several algorithms which can detect people's position, the methods are not yet precise and robust enough for situations in which people are partially or completely out of the robots's field of vision, for example (Konigs and Schulz, 2011). The next three assumptions are valid and have been tested in outdoor real-life scenarios (Murtra et al, 2008).…”
Section: Problem Constraints and Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 90%