2006
DOI: 10.1515/sg-2006-0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster Evaluation of Induced Floral Sterilit

Abstract: A major concern over the use of transgenic trees is the potential for transgene dispersal through pollen and seeds. The incorporation of sterility inducing genes into transgenic lines of trees has been proposed to reduce or even avoid gene flow of transgenes into non-transgenic interbreeding species. The evaluation of strategies for the induction of sterility in transgenic forest tree species has been hindered by their long vegetative phases. In this study an early flowering 35S::Leafy poplar line was used for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches have been proposed to impede the escape and containment of transgenes (Brunner et al, 2007;Ahuja, 2011b;Hoenicka et al, 2012b). These include: (1) reproductive sterility and early flowering (Strauss et al, 1995;Hoenicka and Fladung, 2006b;Brunner et al, 2007;Traenkner et al, 2010;Klocko et al, 2016Klocko et al, , 2018Briones et al, 2020), (2) site-specific excision of transgene mediated by recombinase systems, where the functional transgene is removed from the gametes before flowering (Luo et al, 2007;Gidoni et al, 2008;, and (3) introducing transgenes into the chloroplasts genome to reduced transgene escape via pollen (Bock 2006;Verma and Daneill, 2007). Transgene escape from transgenic populations is a virtual reality, and none of these approaches would likely achieve 100 percent transgene containment in the forest trees in a real world (Ahuja, 2009(Ahuja, , 2011bEllstrand, 2018).…”
Section: Transgene Containment and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to impede the escape and containment of transgenes (Brunner et al, 2007;Ahuja, 2011b;Hoenicka et al, 2012b). These include: (1) reproductive sterility and early flowering (Strauss et al, 1995;Hoenicka and Fladung, 2006b;Brunner et al, 2007;Traenkner et al, 2010;Klocko et al, 2016Klocko et al, , 2018Briones et al, 2020), (2) site-specific excision of transgene mediated by recombinase systems, where the functional transgene is removed from the gametes before flowering (Luo et al, 2007;Gidoni et al, 2008;, and (3) introducing transgenes into the chloroplasts genome to reduced transgene escape via pollen (Bock 2006;Verma and Daneill, 2007). Transgene escape from transgenic populations is a virtual reality, and none of these approaches would likely achieve 100 percent transgene containment in the forest trees in a real world (Ahuja, 2009(Ahuja, , 2011bEllstrand, 2018).…”
Section: Transgene Containment and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, in addition to the desired early flowering, there were unintended impacts on vegetative form. For example, the use of the strong viral-derived 35S promoter to control target gene expression often resulted in shortened plant stature, as was observed for poplar, plum, and eucalypts [ 10 , 21 , 28 , 32 , 41 ]. Therefore, it can be challenging to parse out any vegetative differences if this accelerated flowering system is used to assess vegetative impacts of genetic containment systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%