2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster R-CNN for marine organisms detection and recognition using data augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This modification has increased the speed of the detection with better detection accuracy where reported miss rate was 10.5% at detection speed of 25 frames per second. It worth mentioned that YOLO-based methods have reported a higher speed up rate as compared with Faster R-CNN model but less detection accuracy [14].…”
Section: Deep Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modification has increased the speed of the detection with better detection accuracy where reported miss rate was 10.5% at detection speed of 25 frames per second. It worth mentioned that YOLO-based methods have reported a higher speed up rate as compared with Faster R-CNN model but less detection accuracy [14].…”
Section: Deep Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, [5] introduced a region proposal network (RPN) that shared features with a detection network to produce region proposals. [17] combined Faster R-CNN [5] with several data augmentation methods for marine organisms detection. [18] proposed position-sensitive score maps to address the dilemma between translationinvariance in classification and translation-variance in localization.…”
Section: A Two-stage Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, deep learning through deep convolutional networks (CNNs) show promising results in object detection and classification (Chen, Li & Li, 2020). The deep CNN approach has been gained significant improvement in face detection (Garcia & Delakis, 2002;Osadchy, Cun & Miller, 2007), facial point detection (Sun, Wang & Tang 2013), human attribute inference (Zhang, Paluri, Ranzato, Darrell & Bourdev, 2014), plant phenotyping (Jiang & Li, 2020), organism detection (Huang et al, 2019) and in many other applications. These models achieve state-of-the-art results on several data sets and can enhance the success rate of criminal identification as compared to conventional as well as other shallow machine learning methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%