2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05769-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, people have better recognition memory for go objects compared to no-go objects after the task, which is attributed to enhanced memory for action-relevant go stimuli (Yebra et al, 2019). Episodic memory could influence choices in several ways: People may prefer items for which they have good episodic memory (e.g., Murty, FeldmanHall, Hunter, Phelps, & Davachi, 2016), or action-relevant objects grasp visual attention (Bamford, Klassen, & Karl, 2020) and visual attention can influence choices independent of stimulus evaluation (Gwinn, Leber, & Krajbich, 2019). Thus, GNG training may influence choices via two paths: by decreasing evaluations of no-go objects and by enhancing memory for action-relevant go objects (which does not enhance evaluations of go objects; see Experiment 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, people have better recognition memory for go objects compared to no-go objects after the task, which is attributed to enhanced memory for action-relevant go stimuli (Yebra et al, 2019). Episodic memory could influence choices in several ways: People may prefer items for which they have good episodic memory (e.g., Murty, FeldmanHall, Hunter, Phelps, & Davachi, 2016), or action-relevant objects grasp visual attention (Bamford, Klassen, & Karl, 2020) and visual attention can influence choices independent of stimulus evaluation (Gwinn, Leber, & Krajbich, 2019). Thus, GNG training may influence choices via two paths: by decreasing evaluations of no-go objects and by enhancing memory for action-relevant go objects (which does not enhance evaluations of go objects; see Experiment 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these results suggest that the close advantage occurs even when depth is solely defined by pictorial cues and therefore cannot be fully explained by the classic PPS/EPS account. Instead, the close advantage phenomenon might be better accounted for by affordance, the mere potential for action offered by objects (Bamford et al, 2020). For instance, a recent study by O'Connor et al, 2021 shows that spatial proximity to reward increases impulsive behaviour since objects of greater value (such as a food reward) can afford a more valuable outcome in closer proximity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cognitive area, researchers have studied the visual attention during grasping for a long period. Many literature [2,3,17,23,41] demonstrated that human bias the allocation of available percep-tual resources, named as affordance attention, towards the region with the highest graspability. And such attention usually precedes the action preparation stage [2].…”
Section: Graspness In Cognitive Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%