2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0196-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FastICA peel-off for ECG interference removal from surface EMG

Abstract: BackgroundMulti-channel recording of surface electromyographyic (EMG) signals is very likely to be contaminated by electrocardiographic (ECG) interference, specifically when the surface electrode is placed on muscles close to the heart.MethodsA novel fast independent component analysis (FastICA) based peel-off method is presented to remove ECG interference contaminating multi-channel surface EMG signals. Although demonstrating spatial variability in waveform shape, the ECG interference in different channels sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the effects of motion artifacts can be reduced by proper design of the electronic circuitry and set-up, but not eliminated [ 21 ]. The ECG interference is difficult to remove with conventional filters because the contamination overlaps with the sEMG signal in both the time domain and frequency domain [ 22 ]. For these reasons, it is essential to design classification systems that are robust enough to operate on signals containing such artifacts or can detect these artifacts so that signals containing them are discarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the effects of motion artifacts can be reduced by proper design of the electronic circuitry and set-up, but not eliminated [ 21 ]. The ECG interference is difficult to remove with conventional filters because the contamination overlaps with the sEMG signal in both the time domain and frequency domain [ 22 ]. For these reasons, it is essential to design classification systems that are robust enough to operate on signals containing such artifacts or can detect these artifacts so that signals containing them are discarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the algorithm was tested on 10 subjects only, possibly limiting the generalizability of the results. However, this sample size is comparable to or higher than those of previous studies in the field [5,14,16,28,29]. The analysis on real data, with the illustrative application of respiratory EMG, has to be considered as a feasibility analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is likely the case for additive noise, while other noise sources, such as multiplicative noise, can be interdependent with the desired signal. ICA was proposed for ECG denoising of trunk EMG under the assumption that EMG and ECG signals are independent [ 16 , 17 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. In previous studies, the mixing matrix of the ICA algorithm was extracted by a synthetic dataset composed by combining the signals simultaneously recorded from multiple electrodes (from eight [ 27 ] to 16 [ 16 , 17 ] channels).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…removing the ECG artifact, can be processed through several different simple or more complex approaches [37]. High-pass frequency filters (HPF) [38], ECG subtraction through QRS-complex detection (FAS) [39], adaptive filtering (AF) approaches [40,41], ICA based approaches [42,43] and also combined AF-ICA based methods [44]. Here in this toolbox however, we promise to stick with the simple and fast methods and thus, implement a modified high-pass frequency filtering approach not only to gain from the simplicity but to also improve the performance accuracy of removing ECG artifact from EMG signals.…”
Section: Emg Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%