2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2005.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fasting and refeeding cause rapid changes in intestinal tissue mass and digestive enzyme capacities of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
103
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
10
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, body mass and length were not considerably affected by fasting for 40 days in the Atlantic salmon (Krogdhal and Bakke-McKellep 2005) or by fasting for 1-2 months in the yellow perch (Foster and Moon 1991), confirming that fish response to starvation may vary according to the species. The condition factor of the examined eels decreased, although not significantly, after 31 and 58 days of starvation.…”
Section: Biometric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In contrast, body mass and length were not considerably affected by fasting for 40 days in the Atlantic salmon (Krogdhal and Bakke-McKellep 2005) or by fasting for 1-2 months in the yellow perch (Foster and Moon 1991), confirming that fish response to starvation may vary according to the species. The condition factor of the examined eels decreased, although not significantly, after 31 and 58 days of starvation.…”
Section: Biometric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Improvement in these parameters is attributed by an increase in digestive capacity of fish during refeeding period as reported by (Bolasina, Perez, and Yamashita, 2006). For instance, enhanced digestive activities were reported in Labeo rohita (Yengkokpam et al, 2013), and Atlantic salmon (Krogdahl & Bakke-Mckellep, 2005) subjected to feed deprivation and refeeding regimes. Meanwhile, Zhang et al (2010) reported higher protease activities in F. chinesis juveniles during refeeding, and noticed improved FER and feed intake parameters and better growth performance compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A proximal to distal gradient of intestinal morphology and function has been noted for fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals Secor and Diamond, 2000;Witmer and Martinez del Rio, 2001;Krogdahl and Bakke-Mckellep, 2005;Secor, 2005a). For the Burmese python, evidence of these gradients include a 37%, 51% and 39% decline, respectively, in the wet mass, APN activity and maltase activity for segment E compared with segment A.…”
Section: Temporal Variation In Intestinal Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%