2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fat reduction in comminuted meat products-effects of beef fat, regular and pre-emulsified canola oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

20
126
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
126
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The CASS formulation showed the highest reheating loss values (0.40 %). In the present study, the losses were lower than those reported by Zhang et al (2013), who found values >1.0 % and close to the lowest values found by Youssef and Barbut (2011b). Modified corn starch evaluated by Moghaddam et al (2013) also presented higher stability when compared to its native counterpart.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CASS formulation showed the highest reheating loss values (0.40 %). In the present study, the losses were lower than those reported by Zhang et al (2013), who found values >1.0 % and close to the lowest values found by Youssef and Barbut (2011b). Modified corn starch evaluated by Moghaddam et al (2013) also presented higher stability when compared to its native counterpart.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…They also mentioned that the swelling of the starch granules could have been related to alterations in the b* value. Youssef and Barbut (2011b) reported an increase in L* and b*, and a reduction of a* value when considering different fat replacers. Lightness (L*) is related to the degree of clarity, indicating whether the colors are bright or dark.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher SSP extraction during meat processing increased binding of muscle components, hence contributed to generate firmer structures and greater WHC of cooked meat (Youssef & Barbut, 2011). Figure 1 shows concentrations of SSP for PSE-like and normal meat by high shear method (Figure 1(A)) and protein profiles by SDS-PAGE (Figure 1(B)).…”
Section: Ssp and Sds-pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar behavior is reported by Marchetti et al, (2013) and is attributed to the increase in water holding capacity caused by the addition of sodium alginate and guar gum. Water provides less resistance to compression, leading to softer products (Youssef and Barbut, 2011). Thus, the presence of fiber could have caused a disruption in the protein-water and protein-protein network, leading to a decrease in the gel strength of the product (Lin et al, 1998).…”
Section: Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%