2015
DOI: 10.1080/21604851.2015.1016777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fat, Syn, and Disordered Eating: The Dangers and Powers of Excess

Abstract: This article draws on qualitative research inside one UK secular commercial weight loss group to show how ancient Christian suspicions of appetite and pleasure resurface in this group's language of "Syn." Following ancient Christian representations of sin, members assume that Syn depicts disorder and that fat is a visible sign of a body which has fallen out of place. Syn, though, is ambiguous, utilizing ancient theological meanings to discipline fat while containing within it the power to resist the very borde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, there seemed to be a moral difference between strict and regulated diet ('be good') and the occasional meal out ('be a bit naughty'). This echoes the religious language used by the weight loss industry (Contois, 2015) and commercial weight loss groups (Bacon, 2015), with 'good' and 'bad' foods constituting sin or salvation. However, Stephen recognised that it is easy to get 'paranoid' while logging food, suggesting that too much strictness was not welcomed.…”
Section: Practical Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hence, there seemed to be a moral difference between strict and regulated diet ('be good') and the occasional meal out ('be a bit naughty'). This echoes the religious language used by the weight loss industry (Contois, 2015) and commercial weight loss groups (Bacon, 2015), with 'good' and 'bad' foods constituting sin or salvation. However, Stephen recognised that it is easy to get 'paranoid' while logging food, suggesting that too much strictness was not welcomed.…”
Section: Practical Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 76%