2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00950-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of the sterile neutrino

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new analysis of the experimental data results in a shift of the allowed region towards smaller values of the mixing angle, sin 2 (2θ LSN D ), reconciling the 3+1 scheme with exclusion bounds coming from CDHS [21], CCFR [22] and Bugey [23]. Although the 2+2 scheme is still favoured 3 , the 3+1 scheme is at present marginally compatible with the data, [25,26,27,28]. However, the 2+2 and the 3+1 scheme face the upcoming experiments on totally different footing: if MiniBooNE disconfirms LSND, the 2+2 scheme is falsified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The new analysis of the experimental data results in a shift of the allowed region towards smaller values of the mixing angle, sin 2 (2θ LSN D ), reconciling the 3+1 scheme with exclusion bounds coming from CDHS [21], CCFR [22] and Bugey [23]. Although the 2+2 scheme is still favoured 3 , the 3+1 scheme is at present marginally compatible with the data, [25,26,27,28]. However, the 2+2 and the 3+1 scheme face the upcoming experiments on totally different footing: if MiniBooNE disconfirms LSND, the 2+2 scheme is falsified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this case νa is a linear combination of νµ and ντ . Furthermore, the treatment is also valid in 3+1 four-neutrino mixing schemes in which the sterile neutrino is practically decoupled from the active ones (1 − |Us4| 2 ≪ 1) [34] and Ue3 is small, as indicated by CHOOZ data [22]. Table 1:…”
Section: Results In Frequentistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard arguments disfavoring 3+1 spectra (triplet+singlet) with respect to 2+2 spectra (two doublets) in the interpretation of the current 4ν oscillation phenomenology [1] appear to be somewhat weakened [12,19] in light of the most recent LSND data [6], and should be perhaps revisited quantitatively. Here we make just a few qualitative comments on the mixing pattern that is likely to emerge in 3+1 models characterized by a triplet (ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 ) (mainly responsible for solar and atmospheric oscillations) and by a "loner" state ν 4 (mainly responsible for LSND oscillations).…”
Section: Remarks On 3+1 Mass Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or a linear combination of ν e and ν s (presumably disfavored). Therefore, the favored option for 3+1 spectra seems to imply ν 4 ∼ ν s , with (at least) a small subdominant component of ν µ and ν e in ν 4 , necessary to drive LSND oscillations (see also [12,39]). 3 Assuming ν 4 ∼ ν s in 3+1 models, the triplet states (ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 ) would then approximately be linear combinations of (ν e , ν µ , ν τ ), and the triplet phenomenology of solar and atmospheric neutrinos would practically become equivalent to that of a standard framework with three active neutrinos.…”
Section: Remarks On 3+1 Mass Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation