2012
DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2012.661041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fateful moments and the categorisation of risk: Midwifery practice and the ever-narrowing window of normality during childbirth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the controversy over attribution of effect, change did happen during the AR study. This was, in itself valuable, and was in opposition to a trend for a continued increase in the routine use of unnecessary medico-technical and pharmacological interventions for healthy women and babies in other maternity settings over the time of the study [6,8,9].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the controversy over attribution of effect, change did happen during the AR study. This was, in itself valuable, and was in opposition to a trend for a continued increase in the routine use of unnecessary medico-technical and pharmacological interventions for healthy women and babies in other maternity settings over the time of the study [6,8,9].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of oxytocin treatment to speed up labour in women with slow progress does not increase the rate of spontaneous vaginal birth [5]. Despite international clinical awareness of this issue, several reports show a continued increase in the routine use of medico-technical and pharmacological interventions for healthy women and babies [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Scammell and Alaszewski (2012) investigated the categorisation of risk itself, by midwives in relation to high and low risk pregnancies. The issue in question for this research was not the presence of a particular risk to mother and/or baby, but generic riskiness from any possible source.…”
Section: Insert Table 2 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no unique categorisation of risks that will suit all contingencies and that different categorisations will best serve different objectives (Granger Morgan, 2000). Categories can change as a certain set of criteria, which make up the categories, are redefined in order to accommodate uncertainty and ambiguity (Sarangi and Candlin 2003) and/or social contexts (Scamell andAlaszewski, 2012, Pryor, 2001). Thus, risk categories take on meaning only because of an underlying set of knowledge and beliefs and a category is only meaningful in a particular decision context that clearly defines the actor's goals for categorisation (Desmond et al, 2012).…”
Section: Risk Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%