2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Father's physique influences mate preferences but not the actual choice of male somatotype in heterosexual women and homosexual men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, no preference for hairy chests was found in women whose fathers had a hairy chest 25 , casting doubt on whether the similarity in hairiness between partners and fathers 19 is truly due to sexual imprinting. Opposite-sex parent's height and body type faintly affect, respectively, preferences for height 26 and body type 27 in an ideal partner, but do not count in actual partner choices 27 .…”
Section: Templates For Choosing a Partnermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, no preference for hairy chests was found in women whose fathers had a hairy chest 25 , casting doubt on whether the similarity in hairiness between partners and fathers 19 is truly due to sexual imprinting. Opposite-sex parent's height and body type faintly affect, respectively, preferences for height 26 and body type 27 in an ideal partner, but do not count in actual partner choices 27 .…”
Section: Templates For Choosing a Partnermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Valentova et al ( 2017 ) found that heterosexual men’s and non-heterosexual women’s partner preferences for physique were positively correlated with the physique of their mothers. In another study of heterosexual women and homosexual men, father’s physique was observed to be mildly, positively correlated with preferred physique (Sterbova et al, 2018 ). The effect was strongest in straight women who had had a positive and warm relationship with their father.…”
Section: Proximate Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of marked variation in olfactory cues, cutaneous characteristics, and somatotypes have only recently received attention among researchers studying sexual selection in humans (Štěrbová et al, 2018 ; Dixson, 2021 ; Valentova et al, 2021 ). Sex differences in body composition, notably muscularity and body size are some of the largest between women and men (Wells, 2007 ), which are often attributed to effects of sexual selection via mate choice (Dixson et al, 2010 ; Brooks et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Papers On Sexual Dimorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%