2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue analysis of unidirectional GFRP composites under combined bending and torsional loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notoriously, fatigue failure occurs due to the application of fluctuating stresses that are lower than the stress needed to produce failure during a monotonous loading application. The study reported in [13] considered the fatigue effects in bonded regions of FRP plates used for small bridge applications, but only few information are found in terms of residual strength of the fibers [14][15][16] and FRP-reinforced elements [17,18]. In these studies the fatigue effects caused a reduction of the static strength as expected.…”
Section: Introduction and Research Significancementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Notoriously, fatigue failure occurs due to the application of fluctuating stresses that are lower than the stress needed to produce failure during a monotonous loading application. The study reported in [13] considered the fatigue effects in bonded regions of FRP plates used for small bridge applications, but only few information are found in terms of residual strength of the fibers [14][15][16] and FRP-reinforced elements [17,18]. In these studies the fatigue effects caused a reduction of the static strength as expected.…”
Section: Introduction and Research Significancementioning
confidence: 64%
“…There are several ways of inducing a state of in-plane shear [1,2] in a composite to model the shear stress-strain relationship. Examples are the Iosipescu test [1,[3][4][5], the 108 off-axis test [4][5][6][7], the [þ458/-458] ns tensile test [6,8,9,[10][11][12], the two-and three-rail shear test [13][14][15][16], torsion of a rod [17] and torsion of thin-walled tubes [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one wants to study the in‐plane shear behaviour of a composite, a large number of different experimental setups are available 1,2 . Typical examples are the [+45°/−45°] ns tensile test, 3–8 the 10° off‐axis test, 8–11 the Iosipescu test, 1,9,10,12 the two‐ and three‐rail shear test, 13–16 torsion of a rod 17 and torsion of thin‐walled tubes 18–21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If fatigue loading conditions are required, then the rail shear test is only rarely considered 16 . The favourite test setup remains the torsion of thin‐walled tubes, despite its disadvantages, and it is sometimes combined with tension or bending in biaxial fatigue 18–21 . The [+45°/–45°] ns test is also used 3 for fatigue research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%