2019
DOI: 10.29252/archhygsci.8.3.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Assessment Scales: A comprehensive literature review

Abstract: Nowadays, due to the influence of economic globalization, workers have to work faster and harder than ever under high pressure induced by their managers. Moreover, the necessity to increase productivity and flexibility resulted in longer hours of work and shorter rest periods followed by the irregular working time. One of the consequences of this workload is fatigue (1). Fatigue is one of the most important problems affecting several aspects of human life (2, 3). It is a serious issue in transportation and ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of widely used multidimensional scales include the Piper Fatigue Scale (Piper et al, 1989), the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (Stein et al, 2004), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (Smets et al, 1995). Unidimensional fatigue scales measure fatigue severity only and, as a result of their brevity, are well suited to clinical settings (Aghdam et al, 2019). In contrast, multidimensional scales measure various aspects of fatigue, addressing not only fatigue severity but also the impact of fatigue on physical function and socio-affective functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of widely used multidimensional scales include the Piper Fatigue Scale (Piper et al, 1989), the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (Stein et al, 2004), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (Smets et al, 1995). Unidimensional fatigue scales measure fatigue severity only and, as a result of their brevity, are well suited to clinical settings (Aghdam et al, 2019). In contrast, multidimensional scales measure various aspects of fatigue, addressing not only fatigue severity but also the impact of fatigue on physical function and socio-affective functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of widely used multidimensional scales include the Piper Fatigue Scale (Piper et al, 1989), the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory (Stein et al, 2004), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (Smets et al, 1995). Unidimensional fatigue scales measure fatigue severity only and, as a result of their brevity, are well suited to clinical settings (Aghdam et al, 2019…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum to maximum total score is 0-33 for each person, with the higher scores indicating higher severity of fatigue. The validity and reliability of CFQ have been confirmed in several studies carried out on the general population, patients and Iranians (Rahimian Aghdam et al, 2019;Jackson, 2015).…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Jawaban pertanyaan terbagi menjadi 5 skala likert, yaitu tidak pernah (1), kadang-kadang (2), umumnya (3), sering (4), dan selalu (5) (Aghdam et al, 2019). Pekerja dikategorikan normal (tidak lelah) apabila memperoleh skor 10 sampai 21, apabila skor lebih dari 21 (>21) maka pekerja tersebut dikategorikan lelah.…”
Section: Materials Dan Metodeunclassified