2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2022.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue bond strength of dental adhesive systems: Historical background of test methodology, clinical considerations and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the maximum debonding stress values presented in Table 4 were analyzed statistically. Since both groups had an approximately normal distribution (verified through the Shapiro–Wilk test, Section 2.4 ) and equal variances are assumed (the Levene’s test for equality of variances provided a significance equal to 0.893 for an F value of 0.019), a t -Test of the difference of the means was performed, according to [ 24 ]. In this case, the null hypothesis stated that the means of the maximum normal stress values of the two groups were equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the maximum debonding stress values presented in Table 4 were analyzed statistically. Since both groups had an approximately normal distribution (verified through the Shapiro–Wilk test, Section 2.4 ) and equal variances are assumed (the Levene’s test for equality of variances provided a significance equal to 0.893 for an F value of 0.019), a t -Test of the difference of the means was performed, according to [ 24 ]. In this case, the null hypothesis stated that the means of the maximum normal stress values of the two groups were equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the adhesive interfaces have their own issues. Thus, they are prone to microleakage, staining, and secondary decays, as a consequence of inappropriate tooth preparation, veneer fabrication, internal and marginal adaptation of the restoration to dental structure, or of functional and parafunctional forces [ 24 , 39 , 40 ]. Tribst et al [ 41 ], as well as Andermatt et al [ 42 ] studied the adhesive strength of the composite resin bound to both etched enamel and etched ceramic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Prior chairside tooth replacement attempts used a variety of points like acrylic denture teeth (with or without lingual wire reinforcement), porcelain denture teeth, and resin composites. 12,13 Utilizing the extracted tooth with the help of Dental adhesive products has an incredible bond strength (14.6-15.8 MPa), 14 allowing dentists to treat patients with less invasive tooth preparation that is highly aesthetic and feels natural to the patient. Even though some studies have revealed that laboratory-made composite materials seem to perform well when compared to conventional materials, the wear resistance of laboratory veneering composites is highly variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adhesive/dentin bond is a heterogeneous construct—its composition includes the hybrid layer, which ideally integrates adhesive with highly porous collagen fibers. Failure of the adhesive/dentin bond is the critical issue preventing long lasting dental restorations [ 4 , 10 , 71 ]. The weaker link resulting in recurrent decay is the hybrid layer, which integrates adhesive with the highly porous collagen fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%