Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics: 38th Volume 2012
DOI: 10.1520/stp49542t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior of A36 Steel using ASTM Load-Reduction and Compression Precracking Test Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A boundary element analysis was conducted using the FADD2D code for a shortened ESE(T) specimen (96.5 mm instead of 141 mm in this case). The purpose of the analysis was to derive the stress intensity factor ( K ) solution and back‐face strain relationships for the shortened version and compare them with the published solution for the full length ESE(T) specimen . From these analyses, the compliance based crack length relation and stress intensity factor results for the shortened version were within 1% or less of the full length version equations.…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A boundary element analysis was conducted using the FADD2D code for a shortened ESE(T) specimen (96.5 mm instead of 141 mm in this case). The purpose of the analysis was to derive the stress intensity factor ( K ) solution and back‐face strain relationships for the shortened version and compare them with the published solution for the full length ESE(T) specimen . From these analyses, the compliance based crack length relation and stress intensity factor results for the shortened version were within 1% or less of the full length version equations.…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these analyses, the compliance based crack length relation and stress intensity factor results for the shortened version were within 1% or less of the full length version equations. Thus, the existing equations for the full length specimen were considered acceptable.…”
Section: Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-threshold regimes are shaded in yellow and correspond directly to the shaded regions in Figure 5 b. In the near-threshold regimes, CA cyclic loads were designed to keep the range of stress-intensity factors, ∆K, close to the near-threshold stress intensity factor of A36 structural steel, which was found to be approximately 3 MPa-m 1/2 [ 57 ]. In the near-threshold crack growth regimes, the fatigue crack did not grow notably (black line (thinner) in Figure 10 ), which is consistent with the 3D-DIC measurements (discussed regarding Figure 9 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model agreed fairly well in the early stages of crack growth for 0.33 < c/w < 0.55, but over estimated the crack‐opening ratio by about 10% for 0.55 < c/w < 0.8. It has been observed that low R and high R fatigue crack growth rate data on a Δ K ‐rate basis are merging for deep cracks in bend‐type specimens, indicating a lack of crack closure (plane strain conditions). Solanki et al have found that under pure plane strain conditions on a bend‐type specimen under R = 0 loading, crack closure would not occur, but using the same model for a tension‐type specimen, crack closure was observed at a fairly high level.…”
Section: Fatigue Crack Growth Tests and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%