1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(97)00079-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue damage editing for accelerated durability testing using strain range and SWT parameter criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plots show imbalance in class distribution, where a number of low damage is about 2-4 times more than the high damage. This finding corresponds to the nature of the loading history in which the majority of cycles come in a small amplitude cycle (Stephens et al, 1997). Using these figures the chromosome length is set to 47 and 50 for S1 and S2, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plots show imbalance in class distribution, where a number of low damage is about 2-4 times more than the high damage. This finding corresponds to the nature of the loading history in which the majority of cycles come in a small amplitude cycle (Stephens et al, 1997). Using these figures the chromosome length is set to 47 and 50 for S1 and S2, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The editing refers to the effort of simplifying a load history and it can be done by removing small amplitude cycles that make up a large percentage of generated cycles in the history. To date, those cycles are found individually as appeared in (Stephens, Dindinger, & Gunger, 1997) or based on the segment-to-segment analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains large percentage of small amplitude cycles and the fatigue damage for these cycles can be small. For this reason, in many cases, the signal was edited by removing these cycles in order to produce representative and meaningful yet economical testing (Stephens et al, 1997). Therefore, it seems appropriate to see a method to summarise a fatigue strain signal.…”
Section: Fatigue Data Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For final structural homologation purpose, manipulation methods for accelerate tests results considers 1) Associated to a cycle testing frequency increase up to the resonance limit, the actual praxis includes manipulation of input data by ignoring the low range cycles below 15% of the maximum load 9 , 2) building up a cumulative distribution from a time-history rainflow 10 or 3) filtering the measured events with calculated stresses below 50% of the material fatigue limit 8 . A successful technique was proposed using the strain amplitude together with the Smith-Watson-Topper fatigue model 11 for editing the cycles with the highest associated damage 12 reducing considerably the signal length considerably and consequently the time to run a complete test program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%