2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue damage variable and evolution of rock subjected to cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e increase of these variables causes the second stage to be shortened, which is related to the whole fatigue process [17]. Figure 11 shows the relationship between the deformation modulus and relative cycle times.…”
Section: Fatigue Damage Evolution Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e increase of these variables causes the second stage to be shortened, which is related to the whole fatigue process [17]. Figure 11 shows the relationship between the deformation modulus and relative cycle times.…”
Section: Fatigue Damage Evolution Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results from cyclic loading test on the shale rock, the damage variable can be calculated by using (3). Figure 11 shows the relationship between the calculated damage variables and the strain at peak stress.…”
Section: Damage Evolution Of Shale Rock Under Cyclic Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the mechanical properties of rock under cyclic loading differ dramatically from those under static loads [2,3]. erefore, it is necessary to understand the response of rock mass under cyclic loading condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lifespan of the rock structure, the maximum number of cycles or the maximum amplitude that could be sustained must be assessed. Models able to reproduce evolution of rock strength with cyclic loading are very limited (Li et al, 2003;Xiao et al, 2009Xiao et al, , 2010Bastian et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014). They mostly consist in predicting strength or strain evolution of triaxial or uniaxial laboratory tests for a given material with respect to the number of cycles.…”
Section: List Of Symbols αmentioning
confidence: 99%