2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2022.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue design of mild and high-strength steel cruciform joints in as-welded and HFMI-treated condition by nominal and effective notch stress approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress range Δσ is multiplied by km_total for the A-shape specimens and divided for the V-shape specimens, see equations ( 6) and ( 7) to obtain an ideal Δσeff, see Figure 21. In Table 7, the permissible stress ranges at 2 million load cycles of the individual tested S/N-curves are compared [49]. It is clearly visible here that the ground specimens exhibit a 10.7 % lower permissible stress range due to their misalignment compared to the as-welded specimens, whereas the km-adjusted specimens reveal an increase of 41.2 %.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Km-adjusted Nominal S/n-curvesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The stress range Δσ is multiplied by km_total for the A-shape specimens and divided for the V-shape specimens, see equations ( 6) and ( 7) to obtain an ideal Δσeff, see Figure 21. In Table 7, the permissible stress ranges at 2 million load cycles of the individual tested S/N-curves are compared [49]. It is clearly visible here that the ground specimens exhibit a 10.7 % lower permissible stress range due to their misalignment compared to the as-welded specimens, whereas the km-adjusted specimens reveal an increase of 41.2 %.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Km-adjusted Nominal S/n-curvesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Table 7, the permissible stress ranges at 2 million load cycles of the individual tested S/N curves are compared [52]. It is clearly visible here that the ground specimens exhibit a 10.7% lower permissible stress range due to their misalignment compared to the as-welded specimens, whereas the k m -adjusted specimens reveal an increase of 41.2%.…”
Section: Evaluation Of K M Adjusted Nominal S/n Curvesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, no analysis was performed regarding the selection of fitting methods. The aforementioned research has significantly enriched the application of the notch stress method (Brunnhofer et al, 2022). However, many scholars have conducted limited research on the fitting methods for notch fatigue life curves (Qu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no analysis was performed regarding the selection of fitting methods. The aforementioned research has significantly enriched the application of the notch stress method (Brunnhofer et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%