“…However, the poor result can be attributed to two factors. First, the very poor fatigue resistance is specific to the composition of Vitreloy 1 and other compositions, such as Zr 52.5 Cu 17.9 Al 10 Ni 14.6 Ti 5 (Figure ), Zr 61 Ti 2 Cu 25 Al 12 , and Pd 79 Ag 3.5 P 6 Si 9.5 Ge 2 , have good fatigue resistance with σ fat / σ UTS in the range of 0.24–0.27 when tested under similar four‐point bending conditions . Moreover, some Fe‐, Co‐, Ni‐, Cu‐, and Ti‐based BMG compositions have been tested in tension–tension fatigue, also with R = 0.1, and all were found to have σ fat / σ UTS ≥ 0.25 .…”