1996
DOI: 10.1080/00218469608011081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Failure Criterion of Adhesively-Bonded Joints Under Combined Stress Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liniecki et al [13], Imanaka and Iwata [14,15] and Ishii et al [16] used the stress or stress amplitude to predict the fatigue life of a specimen. Although this information can be useful, these models do not provide any information on the delamination growth rate and thus cannot be used to predict the effect of defects.…”
Section: Stress/strain Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liniecki et al [13], Imanaka and Iwata [14,15] and Ishii et al [16] used the stress or stress amplitude to predict the fatigue life of a specimen. Although this information can be useful, these models do not provide any information on the delamination growth rate and thus cannot be used to predict the effect of defects.…”
Section: Stress/strain Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases of combined stresses the knowledge of stress distributions in the adhesive layer must by coupled with a suitable failure criterion obtained from adhesive joints in order to predict the fatigue strength of adhesive joints with a high degree of accuracy. In order to obtain fatigue failure criterion under combined stress conditions, Imanaka and Iwata [9] conducted fatigue tests using two kinds of adhesively-bonded joint configurations: scarf joints and butterfly-type butt joints, and the relationship between the principal stress ratio and fatigue strength of adhesive joints was investigated. They concluded that the theories of maximum principal, von Mises and maximum shear stresses were not adequate for estimating endurance limits of these adhesive joints, but they found correlation with the principal stress ratio at the endurance limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the data points in Fig. 5 were taken in the uniform stress range of the adhesive layer, using the stress distributions obtained from FEM analysis and the values in Table 1 as well as the values in the previous study [1] for the adhesive layer thickness t=0.1 mm. As can be seen in the figure, the endurance limits decrease with increasing t~3/a ~ irrespective of the adhesive layer thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study [1], we proposed a method for evaluating the fatigue strength under multiaxial stress condition using adhesively bonded butt, scarf and butterfly type butt joints, where the stress multiaxiality in the adhesive layer was varied in a wide range. These joints with thin adhesive layer thickness have considerable uniform stress distributions except at the free end of the adhesive layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation