2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue-induced microdamage in cancellous bone occurs distant from resorption cavities and trabecular surfaces

Abstract: Impaired bone toughness is increasingly recognized as a contributor to fragility fractures. At the tissue level, toughness is related to the ability of bone tissue to resist the development of microscopic cracks or other tissue damage. While most of our understanding of microdamage is derived from studies of cortical bone, the majority of fragility fractures occur in regions of the skeleton dominated by cancellous bone. The development of tissue microdamage in cancellous bone may differ from that in cortical b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, that mechanism should be more pronounced in more highly porous bone . However, whether or not resorption‐related microcavities actually reduce overall bone strength at all is a biomechanically complex issue and remains a topic of ongoing research . Likewise, it is theoretically possible that treatment‐induced changes in tissue‐level ductility and microdamage could alter whole‐bone strength differentially in older osteoporotic humans compared with in cynos or large animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, that mechanism should be more pronounced in more highly porous bone . However, whether or not resorption‐related microcavities actually reduce overall bone strength at all is a biomechanically complex issue and remains a topic of ongoing research . Likewise, it is theoretically possible that treatment‐induced changes in tissue‐level ductility and microdamage could alter whole‐bone strength differentially in older osteoporotic humans compared with in cynos or large animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest microdamage sites were spatially correlated with the largest regions of high tissue strain determined with finite element models. Therefore our findings demonstrate surprising effectiveness of linear elastic finite element models to predict the locations of the largest (and most biomechanically relevant (Goff et al, 2015)) microdamage sites.…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As large microdamage sites (sites over 1,000,000 μm 3 in volume) have been shown to be the most influential biomechanically (Goff et al, 2015), we also examined the spatial correlation assays looking only at large microdamage and highly strained tissue sites. Most of the microdamage volume (86% ± 8%) was located in a small number of large microdamage sites (microdamage sites exceeding 1,000,000 μm 3 in volume).…”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While pre-existing microdamage was an indicator of damage risk, consistent with findings in earlier studies (Hernandez et al, 2014), crack propagation was not a common mode of new damage. This tendency of bone to form new cracks rather than propagate existing cracks has been observed in both cortical (O'Brien et al, 2003) and trabecular bone (Goff et al, 2015; Wang, 2005; Wang and Niebur, 2006; Wu, 2013). Taken together, the evidence suggests that damage is more dependent on alterations in the stress field through the trabecular network than stress concentrations at existing damage, and that similar crack arrest mechanisms are active in both cortical and trabecular bone tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%