2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue life estimation in dental implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Ayllón et al tested commercial cp-Ti G4 dental implants with the same diameter and design of the cone Morse model tested in this work. 8 Their tests were conducted with maximum loads of 220, 200, 160, 150 and 140 N, which yielded lives of 9545, 14 630, 56 398, 182 613 and 185 723 cycles, respectively. One test with 130 N was interrupted after 5 × 10 6 cycles without failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Ayllón et al tested commercial cp-Ti G4 dental implants with the same diameter and design of the cone Morse model tested in this work. 8 Their tests were conducted with maximum loads of 220, 200, 160, 150 and 140 N, which yielded lives of 9545, 14 630, 56 398, 182 613 and 185 723 cycles, respectively. One test with 130 N was interrupted after 5 × 10 6 cycles without failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant implications for implant life are related to the ability of the implant-abutment junction to transmit the load to the structure during mastication efforts. The stress distribution upon implantable devices relies on the interface between hard tissue and the implant-abutment junction, 7,8 but an overall approach seems reasonable, because the fatigue endurance of all components has a significant influence on the long-term performance of the devices. 4 Replacement of a single missing teeth continues to be a challenge, especially for maxillary and mandibular anterior areas where esthetic, mechanical (integrity of the implant-abutment joint) and biological requirements are amplified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forces give masticatory force of 118.2 N in angle of approximately 75° to the occlusal plane. The FEM model was fixed at the bottom surface of bone as shown in Fig 1. J.M.Ayllon, et al [1] developed a methodology to estimate the life of an implant based on material properties and on a numerical model of the implant. He analysed the influence of different factors such as stress concentration at the external thread and the surface treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS J.M. Ayllon, et al [1] in his study the geometry of the implant was defined with the software SOLIDWORKS and then exported to ANSYS where implant was meshed and solved. The purpose of this numerical model is to obtain the stresses and strains in the implant, as well as the Stress intensity factor along the path of the crack.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of fatigue failure is important forprevention of serious medical complications. For the fatigue life P prediction of pedicle-screws was used the method proposed by Navarro [6,7,8] and comparison with other methods used in multiaxial fatigue [9]. In the work, fatigue resistance of hollow pedicle-screw and solid pedicle-screws were compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%