2020
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2020.1804376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue life estimation of adhesive joints at different mode mixities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do so, a new parameter called “corrected effective stress”, bold-italicσboldeff, was defined. Sousa et al 49 proposed a fatigue life prediction model based on a specific parameter, defined as “effective stress”. The model proposed by the authors made it possible to eliminate the effect of loading angle, by combining three different mode mixities (mode I, mode II, and mixed mode (45°)) in one single master curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To do so, a new parameter called “corrected effective stress”, bold-italicσboldeff, was defined. Sousa et al 49 proposed a fatigue life prediction model based on a specific parameter, defined as “effective stress”. The model proposed by the authors made it possible to eliminate the effect of loading angle, by combining three different mode mixities (mode I, mode II, and mixed mode (45°)) in one single master curve.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a new corrected effective stress, σeff, is proposed as Equation (4) where the effective stress suggested by Sousa et al 49 is multiplied by the ratio between the strength of the joint at a considered temperature and mode mixity to the strength of the same joint tested at room temperature: σeff=σeff×σM,TσM,Room M is mode mixity and T is the considered high temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the endurance limit in J‐N method is much lower than the S‐N in normal fatigue, that means the cyclic impact loading is extremely more destructive compared with the normal fatigue loading. In the normal fatigue (S‐N approach) the endurance limit is around 50% of the static strength of the bonded joints 27 while the endurance limit is less than 8% of the impact strength of the adhesives in the impact fatigue loading conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ready-to-use adhesive is then poured into the silicone mould and is cured inside an oven at 30°C for 48 h. The specimens are tested after two weeks, allowing them to fully cure and reach their final strength. 19,20 Figure 4 also displays the finished dumbbell-shaped specimens of EP, GO-EP, and G-EP bulk specimens, respectively.
Figure 4.Bulk specimens of (a) EP, (b) GO-EP, and (c) G-EP (all dimensions in mm).
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%