2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11802-018-3374-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue Magnification Factors of Arc-Soft-Toe Bracket Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doerk et al (2003) applied different structural stress evaluation methods to a bracket toe. Fu et al (2018) reflected the macroscopic geometric effects of Arc-Soft-Toe Bracket (ASTB) crack features and constructed a 3D finite element model to minimize cracking, for different bracket geometries. Irving et al (2005) studied the fatigue performance of two different bracket connections for use in high-speed ocean craft under constant-amplitude and cyclic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doerk et al (2003) applied different structural stress evaluation methods to a bracket toe. Fu et al (2018) reflected the macroscopic geometric effects of Arc-Soft-Toe Bracket (ASTB) crack features and constructed a 3D finite element model to minimize cracking, for different bracket geometries. Irving et al (2005) studied the fatigue performance of two different bracket connections for use in high-speed ocean craft under constant-amplitude and cyclic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crack appears when the bracket toe is not soft enough to release the stress concentration. Therefore, cracks often appear at the end of the toe of the elbow and the direction is approximately perpendicular to the weld [1]. Conventional annual inspection or docking detection of offshore platforms is insensitive to micro-fatigue cracks, leading to missed detection of fatigue cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%