2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue modeling in composites with the thick level set interface method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a crack growth rate can be imposed as the front velocity. This makes the method suitable for implementation of crack growth relations that relate crack growth rate to energy release rate, such as the Paris law for fatigue crack growth [40,41]. In this section, the formulation and solution scheme for the ITLS method are described.…”
Section: Interfacial Thick Level Set Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, a crack growth rate can be imposed as the front velocity. This makes the method suitable for implementation of crack growth relations that relate crack growth rate to energy release rate, such as the Paris law for fatigue crack growth [40,41]. In this section, the formulation and solution scheme for the ITLS method are described.…”
Section: Interfacial Thick Level Set Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for fatigue crack growth experimental observations can be described well with the Paris law, which gives such a relation. In [40,41], the ITLS method has been validated for the calculation of energy release rate and prediction of fatigue crack growth. In this paper, a function between energy release rate G and crack speed V for dynamic crack growth with possible stick/slip behavior is introduced (see Fig.…”
Section: Crack Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One critical point of the fracture mechanics modelling methods presented in the literature is to determine the energy release rate (G) components, then a modified form of Paris law and G-N curves achieved by experimental measurements are employed for evaluating fatigue crack propagation and initiation, respectively. Two typical approaches to compute the G components are the virtual crack closure technique (VCCT) [2][3][4] and the level set method [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the use of a continuous level set field independent from the underlying finite element discretization alleviates the issue of crack orientation bias. Since its inception, the method has been expanded upon by multiple authors in order to deal with asymmetric constitutive behavior, couple the damage formulation with plasticity and cohesive zone laws, improve the representation of traction‐free sliding in shear, and treat fatigue loading …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%