2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue of AlSi10Mg specimens fabricated by additive manufacturing selective laser melting (AM-SLM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
97
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference can be mainly due to the different process parameters considered in the AM manufacturing process and, accordingly, to the different inclusion size. By taking into account Uzan et al 40 , the fatigue strength at 10 7 cycles (roughness 1.5 μm) is approximately 125 MPa, with a corresponding axial fatigue strength of approximately 90 MPa (loading factor of 0.7), which is very close to the fatigue strength found experimentally in the paper.…”
Section: P-s-n Curvessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference can be mainly due to the different process parameters considered in the AM manufacturing process and, accordingly, to the different inclusion size. By taking into account Uzan et al 40 , the fatigue strength at 10 7 cycles (roughness 1.5 μm) is approximately 125 MPa, with a corresponding axial fatigue strength of approximately 90 MPa (loading factor of 0.7), which is very close to the fatigue strength found experimentally in the paper.…”
Section: P-s-n Curvessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…By taking into account Uzan et al, the fatigue strength at 10 7 cycles (roughness 1.5 μm) is approximately 125 MPa, with a corresponding axial fatigue strength of approximately 90 MPa (loading factor of 0.7), which is very close to the fatigue strength found experimentally in the paper.…”
Section: P‐s‐n Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, if the viscosity is too low, the melt pool is not stable anymore and balling phenomena are likely to occur [13]. As a term of comparison, the viscosity of aluminum at its melting point (933.5 K) is as low as 1.34 mN·s/m 2 , whereas the viscosity of titanium at its melting point (1958 K) is about three times as much, since it is 4.14 mN·s/m 2 [14].Even if the most common alloys for AM are the hardenable AlSi10Mg (for fatigue behavior, see References [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]) and the eutectic AlSi12 [10,[26][27][28], new materials are emerging that require a systematic and coordinated effort to understand their optimal processing conditions and final properties [29,30].A357.0 aluminum, also known as A357 or A13570 (with A357.0 being the Aluminum Association-American National Standards Institute (AA-ANSI) designation for this material [31]), is an aluminum alloy formulated for casting. In view of the approaching release of commercial A357.0 powders for AM, the present contribution is specifically addressed to determine the axial fatigue resistance of A357.0 parts produced by L-PBF and tested in their as-built state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the most common alloys for AM are the hardenable AlSi10Mg (for fatigue behavior, see References [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]) and the eutectic AlSi12 [10,[26][27][28], new materials are emerging that require a systematic and coordinated effort to understand their optimal processing conditions and final properties [29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%